Driving alone to work by state

Mississippi has the highest estimate (81.2%); New York has the lowest (48.7%). Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 1-year, 2024.

50 ranked states; DC and Puerto Rico appear as reference rows where the source supplies them. Highest does not mean best. Ranks reflect point estimates; close values may not differ statistically.

Lowest state estimate 48.7% New York
Highest state estimate 81.2% Mississippi
Mississippi: 81.2% Alabama: 80.8% Arkansas: 78.4% Louisiana: 78.3% South Dakota: 78.1% West Virginia: 77.6% Indiana: 76.8% Oklahoma: 76.8% North Dakota: 76.7% Iowa: 76.6% Kentucky: 76.4% Kansas: 76.0% Nebraska: 75.8% Michigan: 75.6% Ohio: 75.2% Wisconsin: 75.1% Tennessee: 75.0% South Carolina: 74.9% Missouri: 74.8% New Mexico: 73.8% Idaho: 72.9% Wyoming: 72.6% New Hampshire: 72.3% Delaware: 72.2% Texas: 71.8% Montana: 71.6% North Carolina: 71.6% Georgia: 71.4% Rhode Island: 71.3% Maine: 70.8% Minnesota: 70.7% Connecticut: 70.2% Nevada: 70.0% Florida: 69.0% Virginia: 68.6% Pennsylvania: 68.5% Vermont: 67.9% Utah: 67.7% Arizona: 67.5% California: 67.3% Alaska: 66.8% Maryland: 66.4% Illinois: 66.0% Colorado: 65.4% Oregon: 65.2% Hawaii: 65.1% Washington: 65.1% New Jersey: 63.3% Massachusetts: 62.0% New York: 48.7%
Each dot is a state. The scale runs from the lowest to highest estimate; intervals are not shown here. Read about uncertainty.

State distribution and comparisons

The middle of the 50-state distribution is 71.7%: the average of the 25th and 26th ordered state estimates. This treats each state equally, so it answers a different question from a population-weighted national estimate.

One other state is statistically tied with Mississippi at 90% confidence: Alabama. This is not a confidence interval for rank, and testing multiple pairs increases false-positive risk.

See the top ten estimates with their 90% margins of error48.4%82.0%MississippiAlabamaArkansasLouisianaSouth DakotaWest VirginiaIndianaOklahomaNorth DakotaIowa

Shared axis spans the complete 50-state estimate ± MOE range. Intervals describe individual estimates; overlapping intervals alone are not our significance test.

How does this compare with average commute time?

These states’ ranks change the most between driving alone to work and average commute time. These comparisons identify different questions worth investigating; a rank gap does not measure a causal effect or a statistical difference between unlike units.

StateDriving alone to workAverage commute time
New York48.7% · #5033.2 min · #1
New Jersey63.3% · #4831.9 min · #3
Massachusetts62.0% · #4930.6 min · #4

Inspect these states, definitions and pairwise differences.

The state-by-state view

Download table

Ranked among 50 states; District of Columbia and Puerto Rico shown for reference. Rank 1 = highest value.

Driving alone to work · 2024 · Percent
RankState / jurisdictionValue90% margin of errorDifference from previous rank
1Mississippi81.2%± 0.8%Highest estimate
2Alabama80.8%± 0.5%Not distinguishable at 90%
3Arkansas78.4%± 0.6%Different at 90%
4Louisiana78.3%± 0.6%Not distinguishable at 90%
5South Dakota78.1%± 1.0%Not distinguishable at 90%
6West Virginia77.6%± 1.0%Not distinguishable at 90%
7Indiana76.8%± 0.5%Not distinguishable at 90%
7Oklahoma76.8%± 0.5%Not distinguishable at 90%
9North Dakota76.7%± 1.3%Not distinguishable at 90%
10Iowa76.6%± 0.7%Not distinguishable at 90%
11Kentucky76.4%± 0.7%Not distinguishable at 90%
12Kansas76.0%± 0.6%Not distinguishable at 90%
13Nebraska75.8%± 0.8%Not distinguishable at 90%
14Michigan75.6%± 0.4%Not distinguishable at 90%
15Ohio75.2%± 0.3%Not distinguishable at 90%
16Wisconsin75.1%± 0.4%Not distinguishable at 90%
17Tennessee75.0%± 0.5%Not distinguishable at 90%
18South Carolina74.9%± 0.5%Not distinguishable at 90%
19Missouri74.8%± 0.5%Not distinguishable at 90%
20New Mexico73.8%± 0.9%Not distinguishable at 90%
21Idaho72.9%± 0.8%Not distinguishable at 90%
22Wyoming72.6%± 1.6%Not distinguishable at 90%
23New Hampshire72.3%± 0.9%Not distinguishable at 90%
24Delaware72.2%± 1.4%Not distinguishable at 90%
25Texas71.8%± 0.3%Not distinguishable at 90%
26Montana71.6%± 1.1%Not distinguishable at 90%
26North Carolina71.6%± 0.4%Not distinguishable at 90%
28Georgia71.4%± 0.4%Not distinguishable at 90%
29Rhode Island71.3%± 1.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
30Maine70.8%± 0.8%Not distinguishable at 90%
31Minnesota70.7%± 0.5%Not distinguishable at 90%
32Connecticut70.2%± 0.7%Not distinguishable at 90%
33Nevada70.0%± 0.9%Not distinguishable at 90%
34Florida69.0%± 0.4%Different at 90%
35Virginia68.6%± 0.5%Not distinguishable at 90%
36Pennsylvania68.5%± 0.4%Not distinguishable at 90%
37Vermont67.9%± 1.4%Not distinguishable at 90%
38Utah67.7%± 0.6%Not distinguishable at 90%
39Arizona67.5%± 0.6%Not distinguishable at 90%
40California67.3%± 0.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
41Alaska66.8%± 1.3%Not distinguishable at 90%
42Maryland66.4%± 0.5%Not distinguishable at 90%
43Illinois66.0%± 0.4%Not distinguishable at 90%
44Colorado65.4%± 0.6%Not distinguishable at 90%
45Oregon65.2%± 0.7%Not distinguishable at 90%
46Hawaii65.1%± 1.0%Not distinguishable at 90%
46Washington65.1%± 0.6%Not distinguishable at 90%
48New Jersey63.3%± 0.5%Different at 90%
49Massachusetts62.0%± 0.5%Different at 90%
50New York48.7%± 0.3%Different at 90%
Ref.District of ColumbiaNot ranked among states29.3%± 1.6%Reference jurisdiction
Ref.Puerto RicoNot ranked among states82.9%± 0.8%Reference jurisdiction

50 states plus 2 reference rows.

What this ranking measures

Workers age 16 and older who usually commute by car, truck, or van alone.

The denominator includes all workers, including people who work at home. It does not count all trips.

The size of the gap

The difference between the highest and lowest state estimates is 32.5 percentage points. The U.S. benchmark is 69.2%. It is not a simple average of the states.

33 states have point estimates above the U.S. benchmark and 17 below it. These counts do not establish statistical significance.

How much should you read into a rank?

Each estimate has a 90% margin of error published by the Census Bureau. For two different states, we flag a difference only when its absolute size exceeds the square root of the sum of their squared margins of error. The comparison tool applies this check to every selected pair.

Non-significance is not proof of equality. These pairwise tests are not adjusted for multiple comparisons and do not form ranking confidence intervals. Statistical method and limitations.

Ranks use the full precision of the source file, so only truly equal values share a rank (1, 2, 2, 4).

Keep exploring

Read the ranking methodology.

Explore the same states in a side-by-side comparison, or combine this measure with others in the custom ranking tool.

Source and method

Producer
U.S. Census Bureau
Product / file
ACS 1-year · GCT0802
Period
2024
Unit
Percent
Calculation
Published estimate; no transformation of the value. Rank = 1 + number of eligible jurisdictions with a higher value.
Coverage
The 50 states are ranked. Washington, D.C., can be added with the toggle above the table; Puerto Rico is shown for reference only, where the source covers it.
Cadence
Annual. 2025 ACS 1-year estimates scheduled for October 29, 2026 (Census ACS updates page); adoption follows editorial review.
Independence
Rank the States is independent. The agencies that produce the source data do not endorse these rankings.

Download, cite, or embed

Download the default full table (CSV) or use the download above for the table’s current filter and order. Data dictionary and source metadata

Updates and corrections

Last updated Oct. 23, 2026. Earlier editions stay available on the data page, and every change is listed in the update log. If a number or definition looks wrong, report an error with the state, value, and source you checked.

Related rankings

State distributions: each mark is one state, from lowest to highest. Each row uses its own scale.

What can we help you find?

Type at least two letters to start searching.

Browse guides Esc to close