Rank the States.
Menu

Healthcare practitioner and technical occupations by state

West Virginia has the highest estimate (8.9%); Utah has the lowest (5.4%). Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 1-year, 2024.

Data year: 2024Source released Sept. 11, 2025Last updated Oct. 23, 2026GCT2408

50 ranked states; DC and Puerto Rico appear as reference rows where the source supplies them. Highest does not mean best. Ranks reflect point estimates; close values may not differ statistically.

Lowest state estimate 5.4% Utah
Highest state estimate 8.9% West Virginia
West Virginia: 8.9% Mississippi: 8.1% Maine: 8.0% Pennsylvania: 7.9% Kentucky: 7.7% North Dakota: 7.7% Louisiana: 7.5% Missouri: 7.5% Minnesota: 7.4% Alabama: 7.3% Arkansas: 7.3% Ohio: 7.3% Vermont: 7.3% Connecticut: 7.2% Delaware: 7.1% South Dakota: 7.1% Montana: 7.0% Tennessee: 7.0% Oklahoma: 6.9% Alaska: 6.8% Florida: 6.8% Massachusetts: 6.8% Nebraska: 6.8% New York: 6.8% North Carolina: 6.8% Hawaii: 6.7% Indiana: 6.7% Kansas: 6.7% Michigan: 6.7% New Hampshire: 6.7% Idaho: 6.6% Wisconsin: 6.6% Illinois: 6.5% South Carolina: 6.5% Arizona: 6.4% Colorado: 6.4% Maryland: 6.4% New Jersey: 6.4% Oregon: 6.3% Iowa: 6.2% New Mexico: 6.1% Rhode Island: 6.0% Georgia: 5.9% Washington: 5.9% California: 5.8% Virginia: 5.8% Texas: 5.7% Nevada: 5.6% Wyoming: 5.6% Utah: 5.4%
Each dot is a state. The scale runs from the lowest to highest estimate; intervals are not shown here. Read about uncertainty.

State distribution and comparisons

The middle of the 50-state distribution is 6.75%: the average of the 25th and 26th ordered state estimates. This treats each state equally, so it answers a different question from a population-weighted national estimate.

No other state is statistically tied with West Virginia at 90% confidence. Every other state differs from the highest point estimate under this pairwise test. This is not a confidence interval for rank, and testing multiple pairs increases false-positive risk.

See the top ten estimates with their 90% margins of error4.8%9.5%West VirginiaMississippiMainePennsylvaniaKentuckyNorth DakotaLouisianaMissouriMinnesotaAlabama

Shared axis spans the complete 50-state estimate ± MOE range. Intervals describe individual estimates; overlapping intervals alone are not our significance test.

How does this compare with manufacturing employment share?

These states’ ranks change the most between healthcare practitioner and technical occupations and manufacturing employment share. These comparisons identify different questions worth investigating; a rank gap does not measure a causal effect or a statistical difference between unlike units.

StateHealthcare practitioner and technical occupationsManufacturing employment share
Iowa6.2% · #4014.6% · #5
West Virginia8.9% · #17.6% · #35
North Dakota7.7% · #57.4% · #39

Inspect these states, definitions and pairwise differences.

The state-by-state view

Download table

Ranked among 50 states; District of Columbia and Puerto Rico shown for reference. Rank 1 = highest value.

Healthcare practitioner and technical occupations · 2024 · Percent
RankState / jurisdictionValue90% margin of errorDifference from previous rank
1West Virginia8.9%± 0.6%Highest estimate
2Mississippi8.1%± 0.5%Different at 90%
3Maine8.0%± 0.6%Not distinguishable at 90%
4Pennsylvania7.9%± 0.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
5Kentucky7.7%± 0.4%Not distinguishable at 90%
5North Dakota7.7%± 0.7%Not distinguishable at 90%
7Louisiana7.5%± 0.4%Not distinguishable at 90%
7Missouri7.5%± 0.3%Not distinguishable at 90%
9Minnesota7.4%± 0.3%Not distinguishable at 90%
10Alabama7.3%± 0.4%Not distinguishable at 90%
10Arkansas7.3%± 0.5%Not distinguishable at 90%
10Ohio7.3%± 0.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
10Vermont7.3%± 0.7%Not distinguishable at 90%
14Connecticut7.2%± 0.4%Not distinguishable at 90%
15Delaware7.1%± 0.6%Not distinguishable at 90%
15South Dakota7.1%± 0.7%Not distinguishable at 90%
17Montana7.0%± 0.6%Not distinguishable at 90%
17Tennessee7.0%± 0.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
19Oklahoma6.9%± 0.3%Not distinguishable at 90%
20Alaska6.8%± 0.7%Not distinguishable at 90%
20Florida6.8%± 0.1%Not distinguishable at 90%
20Massachusetts6.8%± 0.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
20Nebraska6.8%± 0.4%Not distinguishable at 90%
20New York6.8%± 0.1%Not distinguishable at 90%
20North Carolina6.8%± 0.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
26Hawaii6.7%± 0.5%Not distinguishable at 90%
26Indiana6.7%± 0.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
26Kansas6.7%± 0.4%Not distinguishable at 90%
26Michigan6.7%± 0.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
26New Hampshire6.7%± 0.5%Not distinguishable at 90%
31Idaho6.6%± 0.4%Not distinguishable at 90%
31Wisconsin6.6%± 0.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
33Illinois6.5%± 0.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
33South Carolina6.5%± 0.3%Not distinguishable at 90%
35Arizona6.4%± 0.3%Not distinguishable at 90%
35Colorado6.4%± 0.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
35Maryland6.4%± 0.3%Not distinguishable at 90%
35New Jersey6.4%± 0.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
39Oregon6.3%± 0.3%Not distinguishable at 90%
40Iowa6.2%± 0.3%Not distinguishable at 90%
41New Mexico6.1%± 0.5%Not distinguishable at 90%
42Rhode Island6.0%± 0.7%Not distinguishable at 90%
43Georgia5.9%± 0.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
43Washington5.9%± 0.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
45California5.8%± 0.1%Not distinguishable at 90%
45Virginia5.8%± 0.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
47Texas5.7%± 0.1%Not distinguishable at 90%
48Nevada5.6%± 0.4%Not distinguishable at 90%
48Wyoming5.6%± 0.8%Not distinguishable at 90%
50Utah5.4%± 0.3%Not distinguishable at 90%
Ref.District of ColumbiaNot ranked among states4.6%± 0.7%Reference jurisdiction
Ref.Puerto RicoNot ranked among states6.8%± 0.5%Reference jurisdiction

50 states plus 2 reference rows.

What this ranking measures

Share of civilian employed residents age 16 and older in healthcare practitioner and technical occupations.

This does not include every healthcare support job and is not physicians per resident.

The size of the gap

The difference between the highest and lowest state estimates is 3.5 percentage points. The U.S. benchmark is 6.5%. It is not a simple average of the states.

32 states have point estimates above the U.S. benchmark and 16 below it, with 2 equal to it. These counts do not establish statistical significance.

How much should you read into a rank?

Each estimate has a 90% margin of error published by the Census Bureau. For two different states, we flag a difference only when its absolute size exceeds the square root of the sum of their squared margins of error. The comparison tool applies this check to every selected pair.

Non-significance is not proof of equality. These pairwise tests are not adjusted for multiple comparisons and do not form ranking confidence intervals. Statistical method and limitations.

Ranks use the full precision of the source file, so only truly equal values share a rank (1, 2, 2, 4).

Keep exploring

Read the ranking methodology.

Explore the same states in a side-by-side comparison, or combine this measure with others in the custom ranking tool.

Source and method

Producer
U.S. Census Bureau
Product / file
ACS 1-year · GCT2408
Period
2024
Unit
Percent
Calculation
Published estimate; no transformation of the value. Rank = 1 + number of eligible jurisdictions with a higher value.
Coverage
The 50 states are ranked. Washington, D.C., can be added with the toggle above the table; Puerto Rico is shown for reference only, where the source covers it.
Cadence
Annual. 2025 ACS 1-year estimates scheduled for October 29, 2026 (Census ACS updates page); adoption follows editorial review.
Independence
Rank the States is independent. The agencies that produce the source data do not endorse these rankings.

Download, cite, or embed

Download the default full table (CSV) or use the download above for the table’s current filter and order. Data dictionary and source metadata

Updates and corrections

Last updated Oct. 23, 2026. Earlier editions stay available on the data page, and every change is listed in the update log. If a number or definition looks wrong, report an error with the state, value, and source you checked.

Related rankings

State distributions: each mark is one state, from lowest to highest. Each row uses its own scale.

01

Manufacturing employment share

2024 · Census ACS

17.7% Indiana and Michigan · tied highest 02

Management, business, and finance occupations

2024 · Census ACS

21.2% Colorado · highest estimate 03

Science, engineering, and computing occupations

2024 · Census ACS

11.6% Maryland and Washington · tied highest

What can we help you find?

Type at least two letters to start searching.

Browse guides Esc to close