Renter housing cost burden by state

Florida has the highest estimate (58.1%); North Dakota has the lowest (33.8%). Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 1-year, 2024.

50 ranked states; DC and Puerto Rico appear as reference rows where the source supplies them. Highest does not mean best. Ranks reflect point estimates; close values may not differ statistically.

Lowest state estimate 33.8% North Dakota
Highest state estimate 58.1% Florida
Florida: 58.1% Nevada: 54.9% California: 53.0% Connecticut: 51.1% Hawaii: 50.6% Colorado: 50.0% New Jersey: 49.7% Massachusetts: 49.4% Texas: 49.3% Oregon: 49.2% Arizona: 49.0% Georgia: 48.8% New York: 48.5% Maryland: 48.4% Rhode Island: 48.4% Washington: 48.3% North Carolina: 47.6% Louisiana: 47.2% Michigan: 47.2% Delaware: 47.1% South Carolina: 46.9% Maine: 46.4% New Hampshire: 46.2% Virginia: 46.1% Tennessee: 45.9% Pennsylvania: 45.8% Utah: 45.7% Vermont: 45.5% Illinois: 45.4% Idaho: 45.0% Indiana: 44.9% Minnesota: 44.9% Ohio: 44.2% New Mexico: 44.1% Nebraska: 43.5% Mississippi: 43.0% Wisconsin: 42.5% Missouri: 41.8% Alabama: 41.6% Oklahoma: 41.4% Kentucky: 40.2% Arkansas: 40.1% Kansas: 40.0% Iowa: 39.8% West Virginia: 39.1% Montana: 38.6% Wyoming: 38.6% South Dakota: 38.1% Alaska: 37.4% North Dakota: 33.8%
Each dot is a state. The scale runs from the lowest to highest estimate; intervals are not shown here. Read about uncertainty.

State distribution and comparisons

The middle of the 50-state distribution is 45.85%: the average of the 25th and 26th ordered state estimates. This treats each state equally, so it answers a different question from a population-weighted national estimate.

No other state is statistically tied with Florida at 90% confidence. Every other state differs from the highest point estimate under this pairwise test. This is not a confidence interval for rank, and testing multiple pairs increases false-positive risk.

See the top ten estimates with their 90% margins of error31.3%58.8%FloridaNevadaCaliforniaConnecticutHawaiiColoradoNew JerseyMassachusettsTexasOregon

Shared axis spans the complete 50-state estimate ± MOE range. Intervals describe individual estimates; overlapping intervals alone are not our significance test.

How does burden compare with the dollar cost of rent?

These states’ ranks change the most between renter housing cost burden and monthly renter housing costs. These comparisons identify different questions worth investigating; a rank gap does not measure a causal effect or a statistical difference between unlike units.

StateRenter housing cost burdenMonthly renter housing costs
Alaska37.4% · #49$1,444 · #20
Louisiana47.2% · #18$1,064 · #41
Montana38.6% · #46$1,177 · #31

Inspect these states, definitions and pairwise differences.

Values over time

Annual ACS 1-year estimates, 2021–2024. Each year is a separate published survey release; 2020 is excluded because the Census Bureau did not release standard 1-year estimates for that year. Ranks are recalculated among the same 50 states for each year.

Comparability boundary: Processing change in 2024: the contract-rent cap increased from $10,000 to $20,000 per month, also affecting gross rent. Use caution across this boundary, especially in high-rent areas; published annual ranks are not proof of comparable change. Producer documentation.

The state-by-state view

Download table

Ranked among 50 states; District of Columbia and Puerto Rico shown for reference. Rank 1 = highest value.

Renter housing cost burden · 2024 · Percent
RankState / jurisdictionValue90% margin of errorDifference from previous rank
1Florida58.1%± 0.7%Highest estimate
2Nevada54.9%± 1.5%Different at 90%
3California53.0%± 0.4%Different at 90%
4Connecticut51.1%± 1.6%Different at 90%
5Hawaii50.6%± 2.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
6Colorado50.0%± 1.3%Not distinguishable at 90%
7New Jersey49.7%± 0.8%Not distinguishable at 90%
8Massachusetts49.4%± 1.0%Not distinguishable at 90%
9Texas49.3%± 0.5%Not distinguishable at 90%
10Oregon49.2%± 1.3%Not distinguishable at 90%
11Arizona49.0%± 1.1%Not distinguishable at 90%
12Georgia48.8%± 1.0%Not distinguishable at 90%
13New York48.5%± 0.6%Not distinguishable at 90%
14Maryland48.4%± 1.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
14Rhode Island48.4%± 2.5%Not distinguishable at 90%
16Washington48.3%± 0.8%Not distinguishable at 90%
17North Carolina47.6%± 0.8%Not distinguishable at 90%
18Louisiana47.2%± 1.4%Not distinguishable at 90%
18Michigan47.2%± 0.9%Not distinguishable at 90%
20Delaware47.1%± 3.0%Not distinguishable at 90%
21South Carolina46.9%± 1.4%Not distinguishable at 90%
22Maine46.4%± 2.5%Not distinguishable at 90%
23New Hampshire46.2%± 2.8%Not distinguishable at 90%
24Virginia46.1%± 1.0%Not distinguishable at 90%
25Tennessee45.9%± 1.1%Not distinguishable at 90%
26Pennsylvania45.8%± 0.8%Not distinguishable at 90%
27Utah45.7%± 1.6%Not distinguishable at 90%
28Vermont45.5%± 3.0%Not distinguishable at 90%
29Illinois45.4%± 0.9%Not distinguishable at 90%
30Idaho45.0%± 1.9%Not distinguishable at 90%
31Indiana44.9%± 1.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
31Minnesota44.9%± 1.3%Not distinguishable at 90%
33Ohio44.2%± 0.7%Not distinguishable at 90%
34New Mexico44.1%± 2.1%Not distinguishable at 90%
35Nebraska43.5%± 1.8%Not distinguishable at 90%
36Mississippi43.0%± 1.8%Not distinguishable at 90%
37Wisconsin42.5%± 1.1%Not distinguishable at 90%
38Missouri41.8%± 1.3%Not distinguishable at 90%
39Alabama41.6%± 1.3%Not distinguishable at 90%
40Oklahoma41.4%± 1.1%Not distinguishable at 90%
41Kentucky40.2%± 1.2%Not distinguishable at 90%
42Arkansas40.1%± 1.7%Not distinguishable at 90%
43Kansas40.0%± 1.4%Not distinguishable at 90%
44Iowa39.8%± 1.6%Not distinguishable at 90%
45West Virginia39.1%± 1.7%Not distinguishable at 90%
46Montana38.6%± 2.6%Not distinguishable at 90%
46Wyoming38.6%± 3.5%Not distinguishable at 90%
48South Dakota38.1%± 2.9%Not distinguishable at 90%
49Alaska37.4%± 3.3%Not distinguishable at 90%
50North Dakota33.8%± 2.5%Not distinguishable at 90%
Ref.District of ColumbiaNot ranked among states45.5%± 2.0%Reference jurisdiction
Ref.Puerto RicoNot ranked among states27.2%± 1.3%Reference jurisdiction

50 states plus 2 reference rows.

What this ranking measures

Renter-occupied units spending 30 percent or more of household income on rent and utilities, as published in GCT2515.

This threshold summarizes a ratio; households with the same ratio can have very different money left over. Use the source universe rather than a separately reconstructed denominator.

The size of the gap

The difference between the highest and lowest state estimates is 24.3 percentage points. The U.S. benchmark is 48.2%. It is not a simple average of the states.

16 states have point estimates above the U.S. benchmark and 34 below it. These counts do not establish statistical significance.

How much should you read into a rank?

Each estimate has a 90% margin of error published by the Census Bureau. For two different states, we flag a difference only when its absolute size exceeds the square root of the sum of their squared margins of error. The comparison tool applies this check to every selected pair.

Non-significance is not proof of equality. These pairwise tests are not adjusted for multiple comparisons and do not form ranking confidence intervals. Statistical method and limitations.

Ranks use the full precision of the source file, so only truly equal values share a rank (1, 2, 2, 4).

Keep exploring

Why prices, housing spending and burden produce different state orders.

Explore the same states in a side-by-side comparison, or combine this measure with others in the custom ranking tool.

Source and method

Producer
U.S. Census Bureau
Product / file
ACS 1-year · GCT2515
Period
2024
Unit
Percent
Calculation
Published estimate; no transformation of the value. Rank = 1 + number of eligible jurisdictions with a higher value.
Coverage
The 50 states are ranked. Washington, D.C., can be added with the toggle above the table; Puerto Rico is shown for reference only, where the source covers it.
Cadence
Annual. 2025 ACS 1-year estimates scheduled for October 29, 2026 (Census ACS updates page); adoption follows editorial review.
Independence
Rank the States is independent. The agencies that produce the source data do not endorse these rankings.

Download, cite, or embed

Download the default full table (CSV) or use the download above for the table’s current filter and order. Data dictionary and source metadata

Updates and corrections

Last updated Oct. 23, 2026. Earlier editions stay available on the data page, and every change is listed in the update log. If a number or definition looks wrong, report an error with the state, value, and source you checked.

Related rankings

State distributions: each mark is one state, from lowest to highest. Each row uses its own scale.

What can we help you find?

Type at least two letters to start searching.

Browse guides Esc to close