Goods price parity by state

Hawaii has the highest estimate (111.6); Arkansas has the lowest (93.6). Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities, 2024.

50 ranked states; DC and Puerto Rico appear as reference rows where the source supplies them. Highest does not mean best.

Lowest state estimate 93.6 Arkansas
Highest state estimate 111.6 Hawaii
Hawaii: 111.6 New York: 107.3 New Jersey: 107.1 Alaska: 106.3 California: 106.1 Oregon: 105.3 Washington: 104.4 Illinois: 103.8 Maryland: 102.5 Minnesota: 100.5 Virginia: 100.4 Pennsylvania: 99.4 Georgia: 98.9 Massachusetts: 98.8 Colorado: 98.7 New Hampshire: 98.6 Texas: 98.1 Florida: 98.1 Connecticut: 97.3 Vermont: 97.3 Maine: 97.2 Rhode Island: 97.2 North Carolina: 96.6 West Virginia: 96.5 Utah: 96.4 Alabama: 96.4 South Carolina: 96.3 Idaho: 96.3 Missouri: 96.3 Nevada: 96.3 Tennessee: 96.2 Mississippi: 96.2 Delaware: 96.2 New Mexico: 96.1 Montana: 96.0 Michigan: 96.0 Kentucky: 96.0 North Dakota: 95.7 Indiana: 95.5 South Dakota: 95.5 Wyoming: 95.4 Arizona: 95.4 Wisconsin: 94.3 Nebraska: 94.1 Kansas: 94.0 Oklahoma: 93.8 Iowa: 93.7 Louisiana: 93.7 Ohio: 93.7 Arkansas: 93.6
Each dot is a state. The scale runs from the lowest to highest estimate; intervals are not shown here. Read about uncertainty.

State distribution and comparisons

The middle of the 50-state distribution is 96.4: the average of the 25th and 26th ordered state estimates. This treats each state equally, so it answers a different question from a population-weighted national estimate.

Are goods and housing prices in the same order?

These states’ ranks change the most between goods price parity and housing rent price parity. These comparisons identify different questions worth investigating; a rank gap does not measure a causal effect or a statistical difference between unlike units.

StateGoods price parityHousing rent price parity
Arizona95.4 · #42106.8 · #15
West Virginia96.5 · #2454.2 · #50
Alabama96.4 · #2661.8 · #47

Inspect these states, definitions and pairwise differences.

Values over time

The history tracks state price levels relative to national prices in each year. A rising index does not measure the state’s inflation rate. Ranks are recalculated among the same 50 states for each year.

The state-by-state view

Download table

Ranked among 50 states; District of Columbia shown for reference. Rank 1 = highest value.

Goods price parity · 2024 · Index, U.S. = 100
RankState / jurisdictionValue90% margin of errorDifference from previous rank
1Hawaii111.6Not publishedNot a survey test
2New York107.3Not publishedNot a survey test
3New Jersey107.1Not publishedNot a survey test
4Alaska106.3Not publishedNot a survey test
5California106.1Not publishedNot a survey test
6Oregon105.3Not publishedNot a survey test
7Washington104.4Not publishedNot a survey test
8Illinois103.8Not publishedNot a survey test
9Maryland102.5Not publishedNot a survey test
10Minnesota100.5Not publishedNot a survey test
11Virginia100.4Not publishedNot a survey test
12Pennsylvania99.4Not publishedNot a survey test
13Georgia98.9Not publishedNot a survey test
14Massachusetts98.8Not publishedNot a survey test
15Colorado98.7Not publishedNot a survey test
16New Hampshire98.6Not publishedNot a survey test
17Texas98.1Not publishedNot a survey test
18Florida98.1Not publishedNot a survey test
19Connecticut97.3Not publishedNot a survey test
20Vermont97.3Not publishedNot a survey test
21Maine97.2Not publishedNot a survey test
22Rhode Island97.2Not publishedNot a survey test
23North Carolina96.6Not publishedNot a survey test
24West Virginia96.5Not publishedNot a survey test
25Utah96.4Not publishedNot a survey test
26Alabama96.4Not publishedNot a survey test
27South Carolina96.3Not publishedNot a survey test
28Idaho96.3Not publishedNot a survey test
29Missouri96.3Not publishedNot a survey test
30Nevada96.3Not publishedNot a survey test
31Tennessee96.2Not publishedNot a survey test
32Mississippi96.2Not publishedNot a survey test
33Delaware96.2Not publishedNot a survey test
34New Mexico96.1Not publishedNot a survey test
35Montana96.0Not publishedNot a survey test
36Michigan96.0Not publishedNot a survey test
37Kentucky96.0Not publishedNot a survey test
38North Dakota95.7Not publishedNot a survey test
39Indiana95.5Not publishedNot a survey test
40South Dakota95.5Not publishedNot a survey test
41Wyoming95.4Not publishedNot a survey test
42Arizona95.4Not publishedNot a survey test
43Wisconsin94.3Not publishedNot a survey test
44Nebraska94.1Not publishedNot a survey test
45Kansas94.0Not publishedNot a survey test
46Oklahoma93.8Not publishedNot a survey test
47Iowa93.7Not publishedNot a survey test
48Louisiana93.7Not publishedNot a survey test
49Ohio93.7Not publishedNot a survey test
50Arkansas93.6Not publishedNot a survey test
Ref.District of ColumbiaNot ranked among states106.5Not publishedReference jurisdiction

50 states plus 1 reference row.

What this ranking measures

Goods price parity measures geographic price levels in 2024 relative to the national level of 100. An index of 110 means prices are 10 percent above the national level for the specified basket.

This is a geographic price-level index, not a household budget or the inflation rate. State averages conceal local variation. Historical index changes describe prices relative to the nation, not absolute inflation.

The size of the gap

The difference between the highest and lowest state estimates is 18.0. The U.S. benchmark is 100.0. It is not a simple average of the states.

11 states have point estimates above the U.S. benchmark and 39 below it. These counts do not establish statistical significance.

How much should you read into a rank?

BEA does not publish margins of error for price parities, and our price adjustment does not combine the uncertainty of its two inputs. “Not published” means uncertainty is not quantified here, not that the estimates are exact.

Ranks use the full precision of the source file, so only truly equal values share a rank (1, 2, 2, 4).

Keep exploring

Why prices, housing spending and burden produce different state orders.

Explore the same states in a side-by-side comparison, or combine this measure with others in the custom ranking tool.

Source and method

Producer
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis
Product / file
Regional Price Parities · SARPP line 2
Period
2024
Unit
Index, U.S. = 100
Calculation
Published index; U.S. price level = 100. Rank = 1 + number of eligible jurisdictions with a higher value.
Coverage
The 50 states are ranked. Washington, D.C., can be added with the toggle above the table; Puerto Rico is shown for reference only, where the source covers it.
Cadence
Annual. December 10, 2026, subject to the BEA release schedule.
Independence
Rank the States is independent. The agencies that produce the source data do not endorse these rankings.

Download, cite, or embed

Download the default full table (CSV) or use the download above for the table’s current filter and order. Data dictionary and source metadata

Updates and corrections

Last updated Oct. 23, 2026. Earlier editions stay available on the data page, and every change is listed in the update log. If a number or definition looks wrong, report an error with the state, value, and source you checked.

Related rankings

State distributions: each mark is one state, from lowest to highest. Each row uses its own scale.

What can we help you find?

Type at least two letters to start searching.

Browse guides Esc to close