Housing rent price parity by state

California has the highest estimate (154.3); West Virginia has the lowest (54.2). Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Price Parities, 2024.

50 ranked states; DC and Puerto Rico appear as reference rows where the source supplies them. Highest does not mean best.

Lowest state estimate 54.2 West Virginia
Highest state estimate 154.3 California
California: 154.3 New Jersey: 134.3 Massachusetts: 128.1 Colorado: 127.4 Washington: 126.0 Hawaii: 125.3 New York: 122.2 Florida: 122.1 Maryland: 121.1 Connecticut: 117.0 New Hampshire: 114.9 Nevada: 114.1 Oregon: 108.6 Utah: 107.8 Arizona: 106.8 Virginia: 106.8 Rhode Island: 105.6 Delaware: 102.0 Texas: 96.5 Illinois: 93.9 Alaska: 93.8 Minnesota: 91.3 Idaho: 90.0 Georgia: 88.7 Vermont: 86.5 Pennsylvania: 85.1 Montana: 84.6 Michigan: 82.3 North Carolina: 81.4 South Carolina: 80.5 Wisconsin: 79.3 Tennessee: 79.1 Maine: 78.9 Nebraska: 75.2 Indiana: 73.9 New Mexico: 73.6 Ohio: 73.0 North Dakota: 71.4 Kansas: 71.2 Wyoming: 71.1 Missouri: 69.9 South Dakota: 67.6 Iowa: 65.3 Kentucky: 64.3 Louisiana: 63.1 Oklahoma: 62.8 Alabama: 61.8 Arkansas: 58.2 Mississippi: 56.5 West Virginia: 54.2
Each dot is a state. The scale runs from the lowest to highest estimate; intervals are not shown here. Read about uncertainty.

State distribution and comparisons

The middle of the 50-state distribution is 85.8: the average of the 25th and 26th ordered state estimates. This treats each state equally, so it answers a different question from a population-weighted national estimate.

Are goods and housing prices in the same order?

These states’ ranks change the most between housing rent price parity and goods price parity. These comparisons identify different questions worth investigating; a rank gap does not measure a causal effect or a statistical difference between unlike units.

StateHousing rent price parityGoods price parity
Arizona106.8 · #1595.4 · #42
West Virginia54.2 · #5096.5 · #24
Alabama61.8 · #4796.4 · #26

Inspect these states, definitions and pairwise differences.

Values over time

The history tracks state price levels relative to national prices in each year. A rising index does not measure the state’s inflation rate. Ranks are recalculated among the same 50 states for each year.

The state-by-state view

Download table

Ranked among 50 states; District of Columbia shown for reference. Rank 1 = highest value.

Housing rent price parity · 2024 · Index, U.S. = 100
RankState / jurisdictionValue90% margin of errorDifference from previous rank
1California154.3Not publishedNot a survey test
2New Jersey134.3Not publishedNot a survey test
3Massachusetts128.1Not publishedNot a survey test
4Colorado127.4Not publishedNot a survey test
5Washington126.0Not publishedNot a survey test
6Hawaii125.3Not publishedNot a survey test
7New York122.2Not publishedNot a survey test
8Florida122.1Not publishedNot a survey test
9Maryland121.1Not publishedNot a survey test
10Connecticut117.0Not publishedNot a survey test
11New Hampshire114.9Not publishedNot a survey test
12Nevada114.1Not publishedNot a survey test
13Oregon108.6Not publishedNot a survey test
14Utah107.8Not publishedNot a survey test
15Arizona106.8Not publishedNot a survey test
16Virginia106.8Not publishedNot a survey test
17Rhode Island105.6Not publishedNot a survey test
18Delaware102.0Not publishedNot a survey test
19Texas96.5Not publishedNot a survey test
20Illinois93.9Not publishedNot a survey test
21Alaska93.8Not publishedNot a survey test
22Minnesota91.3Not publishedNot a survey test
23Idaho90.0Not publishedNot a survey test
24Georgia88.7Not publishedNot a survey test
25Vermont86.5Not publishedNot a survey test
26Pennsylvania85.1Not publishedNot a survey test
27Montana84.6Not publishedNot a survey test
28Michigan82.3Not publishedNot a survey test
29North Carolina81.4Not publishedNot a survey test
30South Carolina80.5Not publishedNot a survey test
31Wisconsin79.3Not publishedNot a survey test
32Tennessee79.1Not publishedNot a survey test
33Maine78.9Not publishedNot a survey test
34Nebraska75.2Not publishedNot a survey test
35Indiana73.9Not publishedNot a survey test
36New Mexico73.6Not publishedNot a survey test
37Ohio73.0Not publishedNot a survey test
38North Dakota71.4Not publishedNot a survey test
39Kansas71.2Not publishedNot a survey test
40Wyoming71.1Not publishedNot a survey test
41Missouri69.9Not publishedNot a survey test
42South Dakota67.6Not publishedNot a survey test
43Iowa65.3Not publishedNot a survey test
44Kentucky64.3Not publishedNot a survey test
45Louisiana63.1Not publishedNot a survey test
46Oklahoma62.8Not publishedNot a survey test
47Alabama61.8Not publishedNot a survey test
48Arkansas58.2Not publishedNot a survey test
49Mississippi56.5Not publishedNot a survey test
50West Virginia54.2Not publishedNot a survey test
Ref.District of ColumbiaNot ranked among states155.0Not publishedReference jurisdiction

50 states plus 1 reference row.

What this ranking measures

Housing rent price parity measures geographic price levels in 2024 relative to the national level of 100. An index of 110 means prices are 10 percent above the national level for the specified basket.

This is a geographic price-level index, not a household budget or the inflation rate. State averages conceal local variation. Historical index changes describe prices relative to the nation, not absolute inflation.

The size of the gap

The difference between the highest and lowest state estimates is 100.1. The U.S. benchmark is 100.0. It is not a simple average of the states.

18 states have point estimates above the U.S. benchmark and 32 below it. These counts do not establish statistical significance.

How much should you read into a rank?

BEA does not publish margins of error for price parities, and our price adjustment does not combine the uncertainty of its two inputs. “Not published” means uncertainty is not quantified here, not that the estimates are exact.

Ranks use the full precision of the source file, so only truly equal values share a rank (1, 2, 2, 4).

Keep exploring

Why prices, housing spending and burden produce different state orders.

Explore the same states in a side-by-side comparison, or combine this measure with others in the custom ranking tool.

Source and method

Producer
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis
Product / file
Regional Price Parities · SARPP line 3
Period
2024
Unit
Index, U.S. = 100
Calculation
Published index; U.S. price level = 100. Rank = 1 + number of eligible jurisdictions with a higher value.
Coverage
The 50 states are ranked. Washington, D.C., can be added with the toggle above the table; Puerto Rico is shown for reference only, where the source covers it.
Cadence
Annual. December 10, 2026, subject to the BEA release schedule.
Independence
Rank the States is independent. The agencies that produce the source data do not endorse these rankings.

Download, cite, or embed

Download the default full table (CSV) or use the download above for the table’s current filter and order. Data dictionary and source metadata

Updates and corrections

Last updated Oct. 23, 2026. Earlier editions stay available on the data page, and every change is listed in the update log. If a number or definition looks wrong, report an error with the state, value, and source you checked.

Related rankings

State distributions: each mark is one state, from lowest to highest. Each row uses its own scale.

What can we help you find?

Type at least two letters to start searching.

Browse guides Esc to close